ABSTRACT
Intrasocial dynamics involve the relationships among personifications of internal collective quadrant meanings and perspectives. The patterns of preference distribution in the Dream Sociogram seems to depict how broader contexts that are emerging into awareness, as personified by the particular perspectives, are relating to the contexts that evoked specific dreams or life issues. Dream Sociometric depictions of life dramas are holons within the interior collective holon. Characters interviewed with Dream Sociometry are interior and form intrasocial groups. Assessment of life dramas, whether personal, cultural, mythological or purely fictional, creates the objectivity readers need in order to move into spaces of greater freedom. For both waking life dramas and dreams and nightmares, priorities, intentions and preferences expressed, discovered and experienced during the creation of Dream Sociomatrices, Dream Commentaries and Dream Sociograms create contexts that make differences between waking and dreaming less important for readers while blurring their normal, waking distinction between reality and delusion.
