Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

  • Login
  • Hi, User  
    • Your Account
    • Logout
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

Chapter

Between ‘majoritarian’ and ‘consensus’ democracy: the case of the French Fifth Republic

Chapter

Between ‘majoritarian’ and ‘consensus’ democracy: the case of the French Fifth Republic

DOI link for Between ‘majoritarian’ and ‘consensus’ democracy: the case of the French Fifth Republic

Between ‘majoritarian’ and ‘consensus’ democracy: the case of the French Fifth Republic book

Between ‘majoritarian’ and ‘consensus’ democracy: the case of the French Fifth Republic

DOI link for Between ‘majoritarian’ and ‘consensus’ democracy: the case of the French Fifth Republic

Between ‘majoritarian’ and ‘consensus’ democracy: the case of the French Fifth Republic book

ByJill Lovecy
BookDemocracy and democratization

Click here to navigate to parent product.

Edition 1st Edition
First Published 1993
Imprint Routledge
Pages 24
eBook ISBN 9780203198551

ABSTRACT

This chapter describes the dynamics of institutional change under the new Republic that was established with de Gaulle's return to power, and examines the relationship between the initial constitutional settlements. The consensual mode of democracy is distinguished by its institutionalization of power-sharing, it creates a plurality of centres of power and incorporates devices designed to protect the interests of minorities. Lijphart's majoritarian mode of democracy was thus established in France with a succession of loyal presidential majorities in parliament extending from 1962 to 1986. The new Constitutional Council was envisaged rather as 'the defender of the executive', protecting governments from the encroachments and harassing tactics to be expected from an unruly parliament. Majoritarian presidentialism has been muzzled; by being subjected to 'a limitation of the normative possibilities of government' especially once the Council began to include 'procedural provisos' in its rulings, laying down guidelines and criteria to be respected in the subsequent implementation of individual pieces of leglislation.

T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
  • Policies
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
  • Journals
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
  • Corporate
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
  • Help & Contact
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
  • Connect with us

Connect with us

Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2021 Informa UK Limited