ABSTRACT
The first part of the book specified that the myopic eye responds better to ortho C if there are no signs of any extraneous variables. Besides the myopic eye, an extraneous variable can also affect the proposed drills and the design of the lens. In this chapter, I am basing the success of the treatment on the reliability of the ortho C lens by emphasizing its standard design and on arguments why the outcome is due to neurology. I also suggested an experiment to demonstrate that if you deviated from standardization, ortho C would not work. (In the next chapter, I will provide verification on the method.)
Verification starts with examining the apparatus. I want to demonstrate that an ortho C lens does not inadvertently alter the cornea directly after removal; otherwise, the lens would not be able to do what it was designed to do. I also want to demonstrate that precise measurements in its design are necessary to reduce the tension of the oblique muscles by a specific amount before the motor cortex can reset the correct neurological message. If the lens’ thickness is outside the allowable tolerance, for example, ortho C would not work properly.
Furthermore, I want to demonstrate that the treatment involves neurology. An ortho C lens stimulates the eye directly by creating a “contact lens draw” to loosen the oblique muscles. It triggers a “focal point draw” when the correct message is relayed to the ciliary and rectus muscles. When the multiplier effect flattens the crystalline lens, it reverses the first myopic relationship; and when the multiplier effect reduces the elongated shape of the eyeball at the same time, it reverses the second myopic relationship.
234Besides the above demonstrations, I am also including a formal demonstration at the end of the chapter. You can duplicate the experiment to prove that ortho C reinstates the correct neurological message. The correct message depends on the proper “contact lens draw” which in turn depends on the thickness of the lens.
