Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Statistical.Methods.for.Incompletely.and.Incorrectly.Geocoded. Cancer.Data
      loading

      Chapter

      Statistical.Methods.for.Incompletely.and.Incorrectly.Geocoded. Cancer.Data

      DOI link for Statistical.Methods.for.Incompletely.and.Incorrectly.Geocoded. Cancer.Data

      Statistical.Methods.for.Incompletely.and.Incorrectly.Geocoded. Cancer.Data book

      Statistical.Methods.for.Incompletely.and.Incorrectly.Geocoded. Cancer.Data

      DOI link for Statistical.Methods.for.Incompletely.and.Incorrectly.Geocoded. Cancer.Data

      Statistical.Methods.for.Incompletely.and.Incorrectly.Geocoded. Cancer.Data book

      Edited ByGerard Rushton, Marc P. Armstrong, Josephine Gittler, Barry R. Greene, Claire E. Pavlik, Michele M. West, Dale L. Zimmerman
      BookGeocoding Health Data

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2007
      Imprint CRC Press
      Pages 16
      eBook ISBN 9780429127625
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      The geocodes, or spatial coordinates, of sites where cancer patients live or work may constitute useful information for developing hypotheses about the etiology of the disease and for testing these hypotheses via statistical analyses. Several statistical methods for the analysis of geocoded cancer data were summarized in chapter 9. These included methods for detecting the existence and identifying the locations of spatial clusters of cases and regression methods for relating cancer incidence to spatially varying risk factors. The hallmark of statistical methods such as these is that conclusions drawn from the analysis can be made with quantifiable uncertainty, subject to the assumptions of the underlying probability model on which the analysis is based. An example of such a conclusion is the statement: The probability that we would observe a cancer cluster of this magnitude, if cancer cases occurred totally at random within the at-risk population, is less than .001.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited