Introduction

This introduction presents an overview of the key concepts discussed in the subsequent chapters of this book. The book provides reflections on the difficulties that manifest when the justice system utilizes forensic science evidence in the search for truth, and ways to address those difficulties. It concerns how the gap can be mitigated, or even avoided at the outset, by excluding questionable forensic science evidence from trial altogether. The book explores possibilities for resolving factual disputes in criminal matters relying on forensic evidence before a trial ever becomes necessary. It also explores how actors in the legal system can act so as to overcome the gap when forensic science evidence is heard during the trial. The book concludes by exploring other ways forward, including ensuring equitable compensation for both Crown and defense lawyers alike, improving forensic science education in law schools, and improving forensic science education beyond law school.