ABSTRACT
There are many problems with the existing hypotheses and models that are used to support the naturalistic story of how the solar system formed. This naturalistic story of the solar system goes back 4.5 billion years. In this view, the solar system started its journey
as a cloud of dust and gas that collapsed on it. It is considered that a star began to form as the cloud was compressed by some type of unknown forces. As the star spun and gathered more mass, a disk of dust began for creating the planets. The young solar system was formed by taking over millions of years and from the process much debris was left over, which are present today as asteroids and large belts and clouds of material. There was no intervention in the process and it is still continuing. What we really know about the origin of the solar system is highly interesting. According to the secular scenario, energy was converted slowly into matter as the universe continued to expand after the big bang. That matter accumulated to form the first atoms. The first stages of the naturalistic universe contained energy only, but as the expanding universe slowed and cooled, helium, hydrogen, and small amounts of lithium were formed from the energy. The gases thus gathered into nebulae to give birth to stars and planets. As the earliest stars produced their energy through nuclear fusion, heavier elements were assembled and star systems with planets began to form. It is a fact that the star formation and stellar evolution have never been observed, as they are supposed to occur over many millions of years. Evolutionists propose that the stars form as gases, hydrogen and helium in the early universe, collapse due to gravity. According to them, as the nebula collapses, the gases heat up and the nebula spins itself into a flattened disk. But one major problem with this scenario is that as the gases are heated, the pressure also increases, which would tend to cause the nebula to expand and counteract the gravitational collapse. With a view to counter this problem, it was further suggested that some type of shock overcomes the gas pressure exactly at the right time. The so-called shock may come owing to the explosion of a nearby supernova or may come from some other sources. In fact, the problem has presently become a circular argument. There would have been other stars attaining the supernova stage to cause the first stars to form. Consequently, the argument may work for later generations of stars but unable to explain the first generation formed. Interestingly, if the first generation could not form, then they could not have created the materials and force for later generations to form. Evolutionists then suggest that a protostar would form, which continued to gain mass as it attracted nearby gases and particles. If the pressure in the core of the star causes to increase the temperature to 10 million Kelvin, nuclear fusion can start making the star stable, which appears when the inward gravitational force balances the outward gas pressure. It is clear that depending on the size and composition of the star, it demands a multibillion-year process until it consumes all of its nuclear fuel. Finally, at the end of its life, it will either contract and become a white dwarf or explode in a spectacular supernova, leaving behind a black hole or a neutron star. How this process exactly occurred in our solar system may be assumed as a matter of inferring events in the past from what we find in the present. It is true that there are certain assumptions that must be taken as the basis when creating historical theories. The widely acceptable ideas are mainly based on uniformitarian assumptions and have many problems.
