ABSTRACT
Inhibitors of Signal Transduction .............................................................. 170
9.3.1 Sequestration and Breakdown in the
Endosomal Compartment .............................................................. 170
9.3.2 Proteolytic Breakdown in the Cytosol .......................................... 170
9.3.3 Strategies to Induce Efficient Endosomal Release ........................ 171
9.3.4 Interference with Cellular Signal Transduction ............................ 172
9.4 Experimental Design ................................................................................ 174
9.4.1 The Nature of the CPP .................................................................. 174
9.4.2 Experimental Approaches to Analyze the Endocytic
Uptake of CPPs .............................................................................. 174
9.4.3 Monitoring Import and Distribution of CPPs .............................. 176
9.4.4 Cellular Factors .............................................................................. 176
9.5 Conclusions ................................................................................................ 176
Acknowledgments .............................................................................................. 177
References .......................................................................................................... 177
The import of peptide-based inhibitors of intracellular signal transduction pathways
has been one the earliest applications of cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs). Especially
where no low-molecular weight inhibitors are available, peptides that correspond to
pseudo-substrates or interaction motifs provide a short-cut to inhibitors by rational
design. Applications of such peptides range from tissue culture experiments to
therapeutic interventions in whole animals.1-3
The efficient cellular uptake of CPP-peptide conjugates by an uptake
mechanism that assumed direct permeation of the plasma membrane was a driving
force for the widespread application of these tools. The documented success of the
CPP-based delivery of inhibitors may serve as a justification for a rather uncritical
application of these molecules that little considered the cell biology of CPPs. Still
one must be surprised that even though detailed studies about the structure-activity
relationship of CPPs had been performed, demonstrating that import efficiency
strongly depended on the sequence of the CPP, until 2002 the impact of different
peptide cargoes on import efficiency had not been addressed quantitatively.4,5 It was
shown that import efficiency of fluorescein-labeled conjugates of peptides with the
CPP penetratin, as measured by intracellular fluorescence, was strongly affected by
even slight modifications of the cargo.6 Therefore, a quantitative control of import
efficiency is an absolute requirement for conducting analyses of structure-activity
relationships for different peptide conjugates inside the cell.7