Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

  • Login
  • Hi, User  
    • Your Account
    • Logout
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

Chapter

Good Forensic Practice — Obligations of the Analyst

Chapter

Good Forensic Practice — Obligations of the Analyst

DOI link for Good Forensic Practice — Obligations of the Analyst

Good Forensic Practice — Obligations of the Analyst book

Good Forensic Practice — Obligations of the Analyst

DOI link for Good Forensic Practice — Obligations of the Analyst

Good Forensic Practice — Obligations of the Analyst book

ByKeith Inman, Norah Rudin
BookPrinciples and Practice of Criminalistics

Click here to navigate to parent product.

Edition 1st Edition
First Published 2000
Imprint CRC Press
Pages 28
eBook ISBN 9780429247620

ABSTRACT

A. Asking the Right Question................................................................... 246 1. Translating the Legal Question into a Science Question ........... 246 2. Formulating Hypotheses............................................................... 248 3. How Much Should an Analyst Know?......................................... 248

a. Analyst Bias............................................................................. 250 4. What Can Science Contribute? .................................................... 252

a. Can the Question Be Answered by Science? ........................ 252 b. Is the Evidence Useful? .......................................................... 253 c. Is the Test Useful?................................................................... 255 d. What Further Questions Arise as a Result of Analysis? ...... 256

B. Examination and Analysis.................................................................... 257 1. Documentation.............................................................................. 258

a. Documentation Standards..................................................... 258 2. Preserving the Integrity of the Evidence ..................................... 259

a. Prevention of Contamination ............................................... 259 b. Detection of Contamination ................................................. 259

3. Results ............................................................................................ 260 a. Analyst Judgment ................................................................... 262

4. Verification of Results ................................................................... 263 a. Blind Second Read ................................................................. 263 b. Technical Review .................................................................... 263

5. Interpretation and Conclusions ................................................... 264 a. Defining Facts and Assumptions .......................................... 264

b. Explainable Differences.......................................................... 265 c. Inference of Source vs. Inference of Contact ....................... 265

i. Inference of Source .......................................................... 265 ii. Inference of Contact ........................................................ 268

d. A Statement of Conclusion ................................................... 268 C. Summary ............................................................................................... 269 References ...................................................................................................... 271

We have finally arrived at the point in a case investigation that criminalists are most familiar with — the laboratory analysis or comparison. For a complex analysis, a good analyst may spend more time thinking about it than analyzing it. Failure to do so may result in an incorrect or suboptimal analysis, rendering useless all the good work that may have preceded it. The events and decisions surrounding the physical act of analysis share equal importance with sample processing and data collection. In this chapter we will discuss the decision-making process that occurs between the time the evidence is collected and the time the analysis is performed.

T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
  • Policies
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
  • Journals
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
  • Corporate
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
  • Help & Contact
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
  • Connect with us

Connect with us

Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2021 Informa UK Limited