ABSTRACT
In the Matter of the Estate of Violet Houssien, 3AN-98-59 P/R, Superior Court for the State of Alaska, Anchorage, 1999.
A will and supporting letters (typed by an unknown person, “Kim”) were purported to have been authored by the decedent and were presented by her former
neighbors, but their authorship was disputed by contestants. The Court decided in favor of the decedent’s siblings, rejecting the will. From the Sept. 23, 1999 Decision. The decision was upheld in
Crittell v. Bingo
et al. by the Supreme Court of Alaska No. S-9468. From the Nov. 9, 2001 Decision No. 5496: “Though denied by the [appellants], the evidence proves that the Will and “Kim” papers were prepared by the [appellants] or at their direction .” This decision is discussed in Chapter 7, and can be accessed at
https://www.touchngo.com/sp/html/sp-5496.htm
. •
In the Matter of the Appeal by Amarjit (Jack) Saluja, 30082 and 94-16, 1994, California State Personnel Board, 1994.
