Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      2Chapter 4 Meiofaunal Diversity
      loading

      Chapter

      2Chapter 4 Meiofaunal Diversity

      DOI link for 2Chapter 4 Meiofaunal Diversity

      2Chapter 4 Meiofaunal Diversity book

      2Chapter 4 Meiofaunal Diversity

      DOI link for 2Chapter 4 Meiofaunal Diversity

      2Chapter 4 Meiofaunal Diversity book

      Edited ByRoberto Danovaro
      BookMethods for the Study of Deep-Sea Sediments, Their Functioning and Biodiversity

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2009
      Imprint CRC Press
      Pages 18
      eBook ISBN 9780429130960
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      References ......................................................................................................................................250

      In deep-sea soft sediments, a multiple corer is used to collect simultaneously several meiofaunal samples (e.g., 4-12 corers; Elmgren and Radziejewska 1989). The instrument allows the collection of undisturbed sediment samples of a given surface area to analyze the horizontal and vertical distribution of benthic organisms. Another common sampling instrument for soft sediments is the box corer (Fleeger et al. 1983). The weight of a box corer after sampling can range from 150 to >750 kg and collect a surface sediment of 0.02-1.0 m2 down to a depth of 50 cm. From the box corer, meiofaunal samples could be collected using manual Plexiglas® corers (internal diameter 3.6 cm), one replicate from each different deployment. However, during sampling recovery, most box corers can allow the mixing of the sediment surface, which might alter the quality of the sample. Bett et al. (1994), Shirayama and Fukushima (1995), and Bett (2000), comparing sampling efciency of multiple corers and box corers in deep-sea environments, pointed out that meiofaunal abundance collected using box corers was signicantly lower than that determined in samples collected using multiple corers. However, for the studies, comparing NIOZ-type box corers and multiple corers reported identical results for all benthic variables investigated, suggesting that both sampling devices are adequate for the sampling of deep-sea meiofauna (Danovaro et al. 1999b).

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited