ABSTRACT

Let T2 be the transformation group which translates the last p3 components of each

Xa, and let GBT be as defined in Section 7.2.2 with k=3, p1+p2+p3=p. This problem remains invariant under the group (GBT, T2) of affine transformations, transforming

(with k=3), (t can be considered as a p-vector with the first p1+p2

components equal to zero). A maximal invariant in the space of [the induced

transformation on is is (R1, R2) [also its equivalent

statistic ]. A corresponding maximal invariant in O is Under H0,

and under the alternatives H1, From (7.81) it follows that the likelihood ratio test is not uniformly most

powerful (optimum) invariant for this problem and that there is no uniformly most powerful invariant test for the problem. However, for fixed p, the likelihood ratio test is nearly optimum as N becomes large (Wald, 1943). Thus, if p is not large, it seems likely that the sample size occurring in practice was usually large enough for this result to be relevant. However, if the dimension p is large, it may

be that the sample size N must be extremely large for this result to apply. Giri (1961) has shown that the difference of the powers of the likelihood ratio test and the best invariant test is o(N-1) when p1, p are both equal to O(N) and

For the minimax property Giri (1968) has shown that no invariant

test under (GBT, T2) is minimax for testing H0 against for every choice

of ?. However Giri (1968) has shown that the test which rejects against

the alternatives whenever R1+((n-p1)/ p2)R2=c where c depends on the level a of the test is locally best invariant and locally minimax as ?? 0.