ABSTRACT

Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 194 Port Site Recurrence............................................................................................................ 194 Pathophysiology o f Tumor Im plan ts ................................................................................. 195 Acute P ain .............................................................................................................................. 196 Chronic P a in ............................................................................................................................196 Im m une R esponse ................................................................................................................ 197

INTRODUCTION

Videothoracoscopy, or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), represents a major advance in thoracic surgery in the last decade. VATS, compared to conven­ tional thoracotomy, produces less postoperative pain, shorter length o f hospital stay, quicker return to normal activities and improved cosmesis.32 Most o f these benefits still await well-designed prospective, randomized clinical studies. Despite the lack o f data, VATS has been enthusiastically embraced by thoracic surgeons.22 Conceivably, any thoracic procedure performed by conventional thoracotomy can be completed through VATS.28 However, the surgeon’s enthusiasm must be tem­ pered by the relative cost effectiveness and therapeutic benefit o f VATS versus con­ ventional thoracotomy. With the paucity o f large clinical trials, VATS for pulmo­ nary tumors must be approached either through a protocol or strict oncologic guidelines. The paucity of clinical trials documenting the efficacy o f VATS is only surpassed by the lack of experimental data regarding the biology and pathophysi­ ology associated with this novel technique. This chapter describes several patho­ physiologic mechanisms associated with VATS.