ABSTRACT

Ongoing advancements in the pre-and postoperative care of

the neonate with a surgical condition have enabled the survival

of an increasing number of infants with congenital malforma-

tions. For decades, surgeons have insisted on a regular self-

examination of outcomes in order to ensure the optimal

treatment of our patients. Outcome analysis traditionally

relates to the rudimentary end result of an operation utilizing variables such as mortality, operative time, specific complica-

tion rates (i.e. incidence of esophageal stricture following

esophageal atresia repair), and hospital length of stay, to

name a few. Recently, outcomes research has become a more

complex endeavor. Measures of long-term outcomes, including

‘functional outcome’ and ‘health-related quality of life’ are

equally important to the morbidity sustained as a result of a

congenital malformation and its attendant surgical correction.

The methods by which subjective assessments are expressed as a

quantitative measure are therefore important for the surgeon to

understand. These data serve as an important adjunct to

prenatal counseling, offer information about future health

expectations for families, assist the surgeon in identifying

potential improvements in perioperative management, and will

likely be utilized by public agencies charged with implementing

health policy, especially in an era of diminishing resources.

Therefore, long-term outcomes are of specific import to the

neonates we care for, the families we answer to, and our

colleagues charged with the continued efforts to improve the

surgical care of our youngest patients. This chapter will begin

by focusing on the specific language and methodology of

modern long-term outcomes research as a prelude to the

current status of long-term outcomes assessment in newborn

surgical conditions commonly treated by the pediatric surgeon.

In 1934, Ernest A Codman, an orthopedic surgeon, espoused

the ‘end result idea’. In his book The shoulder, Dr Codman

introduced this ‘common sense notion that every hospital