ABSTRACT
Building on Vorob’ev’s work, we thought it should be easy to explain
why Bell’s reasoning failed and why one should look at Bell’s
“proof” from a different angle. However, we soon found out that
the followers of Bell dismissed our counterarguments because there
existed a large number of different proofs, most of them explained
in Bell’s collected works (Bell, 2001). As mentioned earlier, Walter
and I, therefore, decided to go through all of these proofs and to
attempt to refute each single one. Our work was performed over
several years and the presentation here does not follow the precise
timeline. We found that all of these proofs were actually based on a
few principles that can be described and refuted rather easily, and
here is an excerpt of our findings.
