ABSTRACT

A well-known criteria that we remember from engineering and represents deformation, is named strain. Defining engineering strain is very simple, if we imagine a rod with an initial length l0 (see Fig. 2.1), when subjected to tension its length increases to ln, then the engineering strain is defined by:

εE n l l l

= − 0 0

(2.1.1)

If we multiply the numerator and denominator of Eq. (2.1.1) into l ln0 + then we have:

nl l l l l l l

l l

l l l

l l

l =

−( ) +( ) +( )

= −

+ 

 

 

= −0 0

2 2

+ −

 

 

= − +( )l l

l

l l ln

In the above expression if εE << 2, then we can ignore it and define a new strain known as “Green strain” which will be:

εG n l l

l =

(2.1.2)

Comparing Eqs. (2.1.1) and (2.1.2) shows that ε ε εE G

= +( )1 2

or

alternatively:

ε ε εG E E= +( )1 2 It is obvious that if εE <<1 (small deformation), in Eq. (3) we can ignore

the term εE 2

2 and then we can say that Green strain εG and engineering

strain εE are close ε εG E≅ . Meanwhile we can rearrange Eq. (2.1.2) into

the following form:

l l ln G 2

0 22− = ε (2.1.3)

When the deformation is large and is not a uni-axial tension type, we can also define the Green strain tensor by relaying on a simple definition in Eq. (2.1.3). According to Fig. 2.2, vector r shows position of a point in un-deformed position and the metric tensor can be shown by g , the differential length element ds can be found from Eq. (1.3.1) written by:

ds g dx dx i jij i j2 1 2 3= =. , , (2.1.4)

In the deformed body vector 

R is position of the same point and the metric tensor will change to G because the deformation may be too big that

causes change of the natural coordinates. Similarly the differential length element dS can be found from Eq. (1.3.1) written by:

dS G dx dx i jij i j2 1 2 3= =. , , (2.1.5)

General form of Eq. (2.1.3) gives Green strain tensor like this:

dS ds dx dxij i j2 2 2− = ε (2.1.6)

By substituting Eqs. (2.1.4) and (2.1.5) into Eq. (2.1.6) we have:

G dx dx g dx dx dx dxij i j

ij i j− = 2 ε

Simplify the above equation gives the Green strain tensor which is:

ε ij ij ijG g= −( )12 (2.1.7) Equation (2.1.7) shows that Green strain tensor has covariant components; therefore, it should be expressed by contra-variant base vectors as indicated in Eq. (1.2.11) ε ij can be expressed by the un-deformed contravariant base vectors like this:

(2.1.8)

According to Fig. 2.2, the displacement vector u is:

 R r u= +

If we differentiate versus the coordinate αi, then we have ∂ ∂

= ∂ ∂

+ ∂ ∂

 R r u

i i iα α α

since ∂ ∂

= 

R G i

iα , ∂ ∂

= r g i

iα and ∂

∂ =

u u i

iα , then we can write:

(2.1.9)

By substituting Eq. (2.1.9) and also g g gij i j= ⋅ into Eq. (2.1.7) the Green strain tensor can be written in terms of displacement vector as follows:

ε ij i j j i i jg u g u u u= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅( )12    , , , , (2.1.10)

It is also possible that express the Green strain tensor in terms of the deformed covariant base vectors, that is, substitute and also G G Gij i j= ⋅ into Eq. (2.1.7) to have the following expression:

ε ij i j j i i jG u G u u u= ⋅ + ⋅ − ⋅( )12    , , , , (2.1.11)

It is also possible to use covariant differentiation of the displacement components from Eq. (1.3.16) to change the strain formulas for strain tensor, that is,

 u u g u u gm m

 u U G u U Gm m

It should be remembered that Eq. (1.3.16) is written in terms of covariant base vectors while Eqs. (2.1.12a) and (2.1.12b) are written in terms

of contra-variant base vectors. This is because Green strain is a covariant tensor and needs an expression with covariant components.