ABSTRACT
The pursuit of truth is not an easily traversed path; signposts are often nonexistent or at best confusing. Furthermore, the same destination can be reached in many different ways. Sometimes, "the best test of truth" (Abrams v. United States, 1919) takes a debate format where speakers present their views and individuals are polled. In other cases, "truth" is tested in a court of law where attorneys argue opposing positions and juries determine how well arguments are made. In still other contexts, "truth" is determined by the scientific method in which data are systematically collected to assess which explanation is most consistent with the evidence. Whether the decisions are based on the weight of scientific evidence, the deliberations of a jury, or the vote of one's peers, the ultimate goal is to make the best possible judgment.
