ABSTRACT

In this section we provide a brief overview and comparison of the groups and their ideologies. Although necessarily superficial, it serves an orientating function, an advance organiser (Ausubel, 1968). The overview, in Table 7.1, uses the elements of the model of educational ideologies (Table 6.3) for its categories. It differs in that two elements are omitted for brevity, and the political ideology (and name) of the social interest group is added, reflecting the social location, aspirations and interests of the group. Overview of the Five Educational Ideologies https://www.niso.org/standards/z39-96/ns/oasis-exchange/table">

Social group

Industrial trainer

Technological pragmatist

Old humanist

Progressive educator

Public educator

Political Ideology

Radical right, ‘New Right’

meritocratic, conservative

conservative/liberal

liberal

Democratic socialist

View of Mathematics

Set of Truths, and Rules

Unquestioned body of useful knowledge

Body of structed pure knowledge

process view:personalized maths

Social constructivism

Moral values

Authoritarian ‘Victorian’ values, Choice, Effort, Self-help, Work, Moral Weakness, Us-good, Them-bad

Utilitarian,

Pragmatism,

Expediency, ‘wealth

creation’,

Technological

development

’Blind’ Justice, Objectivity, Rule-centred Structure, Hierarchy, Paternalistic ‘Classical’ view

Person-centred, Caring, Empathy, Human values, Nurturing, Maternalistic, ‘Romantic’ view

Social Justice, Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, Social awareness, Engagement and Citizenship

Theory of Society

Rigid Hierarchy Market-place

Meritocratic Hierarchy

Elitist, Class stratified

soft Hierarchy welfare state

Inequitable hierarchy needing reform

Theory of the Child

Elementary School Tradition: Child ‘fallen angel’ and ‘empty vessel’

Child ‘empty vessel’ and ‘blunttool’ Future worker or manager

Dilute Elementary School view Character building Culture tames

Child-centred, Progressive view, Child: ‘growing flower’ and ‘innocent savage’

Social Conditions view: ‘clay moulded by environment’ and ‘sleeping giant’

Theory of Ability

Fixed and inherited

Inherited ability

Inherited cast of mind

Varies, but needs cherishing

Cultural product: Not Realized by effort fixed

Mathematical aims

‘Back-to-Basics’:numeracy and social training in obedience

Useful maths to appropriate level and Certification (industry-centred)

Transmit body of mathematical knowledge (Maths-centred)

Creativity, Self-realization through mathematics (Child-centred)

Critical awareness and democratic citizenship via mathematics

Theory of Learning

Hard work, effort, practice, rote

Skill acquisition, practical experience

Uderstanding and application

Activity, Play, Exploration

Questioning, Decision making, Negotiation

Theory of Teaching Mathematics

Authoritarian Tranmission, Drill, no ‘frills’

Skill instructor Motivate through work-relevance

Explain, Motivate Pass on structure

Facilitate personal exploration Prevent Failure

Discussion, Conflict Questioning of content and pedagogy

Theory of Resources

Chalk and Talk Only Anti-calculator

Hands-on and Microcomputers

Visual aids to motivate

Rich environment to explore

Socially relevant Authentic

Theory of Assessment in Maths

External testing of simple basics

Avoid cheating External tests and certification Skill profiling

External examinations based on hierarchy

Teacher led internal assessment Avoid failure

Various modes. Use of social issues and content

Theory of Social Diversity

Differentiated schooling by Class Crypto-racist, Monoculturalist

Vary curriculum by future occupations

Vary curriculum by ability only (maths neutral)

Humanize neutral maths for all: Use local culture

Accommodation of social and cultural diversity a necessity