DOI link for />À`Ê,Þ>]ÊÀÃiÌ
Many of the sites described above were single farming units. Little Woodbury, whatever its social implications, probably had only one centrally placed house in use at any one time (although the possibility remains that other contemporary huts may have been placed around the periphery of the enclosure). With its ﬁne early house, 1.6 ha farmyard and considerable grain-storing capacity, it must have been the homestead of a wealthy man and his family. A short distance from the excavated site lay a far more substantial ditched enclosure, known as Great Woodbury (Figure 12.2), covering an area of about 4 ha and enclosed by a massive ditch of hillfort proportions some 6 m wide and 3.6 m deep. A single section through the ditch revealed pottery of saucepan pot type in the primary silting. While it would clearly be wrong to base too much on this limited evidence, it could well be argued that Great Woodbury replaced Little Woodbury. Certainly the relatively small percentage of saucepan pot wares from Little Woodbury would suggest that it ceased to be occupied fairly early in the period during which these types were commonly in use; moreover, it is hardly likely that the two sites were occupied at the same time.