ABSTRACT

Both the violent and the peaceful proponents of netwar – a term we coined to

call attention to the rise of a new mode of conflict that relies on network forms

of organization, strategy and technology attuned to the information age – have

grown stronger and spread farther since we first published Networks and

Netwars at RAND in 2001. That book develops more fully the netwar concept

that we fielded initially in 1993 and expanded upon in our 1996 RAND

monograph, The Advent of Netwar. Today, in 2004, sprawling networks of

non-state actors are assailing US policies on multiple fronts. One major front

consists of Al Qaeda and its affiliates, which keep striving to mount

catastrophic terrorist attacks. Another front features civic-action networks

around the world that have banded together in (mostly) peaceful efforts to

constrain US power – particularly the application of American military

power. Both types of netwar actors pose serious challenges to US policy and

strategy, and to US-European relations. The former – the terrorists –

continue to endanger US and European security. But, over the long term, the

emergence of a globally networked civil society should prove the more

powerful, enduring, and transformative development. These are the themes we

emphasize in this article, which updates some of the key points that we made

in the 2001 edition of our book and in the foreword to the 2003 Spanish edition

of Networks and Netwars (Redes y Guerras en Red).