ABSTRACT

At the end of his now classic essay, ‘Orbits: the Ancient Mediterranean Tradition

of Urban Networks’, the late Jean Gottman pondered whether ‘this ancient

Mediterranean tradition [of city networks] express[es] basic curiosity or even

more, the impulse to learn how to deal with others, how to overcome distance, and

perhaps even how to overcome human diversity?’ (Gottman, cited in Gottman

and Harper 1990: 34). In exploring this question Gottman counterposed two

trajectories of urban Mediterranean civilization, the one Platonic, characterized

by small, insular and self-sufficient city-states, the other Alexandrine, marked by

vast, poly-nuclear and densely interconnected territories. ‘Which is the essential

orbit?’ (Gottman and Harper 1990: 24). While recognizing the subtle

interdependencies linking both patterns of urbanization, from the vantage point

of the 1983 Oxford lecture from which his essay derives, Gottman cautiously left

the question open.