Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future
      loading

      Chapter

      The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future

      DOI link for The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future

      The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future book

      The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future

      DOI link for The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future

      The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future book

      Edited ByJohn Cantwell, Rajneesh Narula
      BookInternational Business and the Eclectic Paradigm

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2003
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 19
      eBook ISBN 9780429234354
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      Although the eclectic paradigm (or the eclectic theory as it was initially called) of international production was first put forward by the present author at a Nobel Symposium in Stockholm in 1976, its origins can be traced back to the mid-1950s. At that time, I was writing my PhD thesis, later to be published as a book (Dunning 1958), on US direct investment in British manufacturing industry. Earlier research by Rostas (1948), Frankel (1955) and some Anglo-American study teams1 had shown that the labour productivity in US manufacturing industry was, on average, 2-5 times higher than that in UK industry. The question this fact posed in my mind was: ‘was this difference in productivity a reflection of the superior indigenous (and immobile) resources of the US (cf. the UK) economy; or was it due to the more proficient way in which the managers of US firms (cf. UK firms) harnessed and organised these resources?’—a capability which, I argued, might be transferable, at least to some extent across national boundaries.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited