ABSTRACT

Export sales contracts are central to international commercial transactions, and around them revolve a series of connected but distinct relationships, including cargo insurance, transportation, and payment arrangements. The rules and practices governing such contracts vary from one export transaction to another, based on the agreement of the parties as well as the legal system. National legal systems on contracts may differ, but the basic principles of contracts, such as good faith and consideration, are generally recognized and accepted in many countries. There is also a movement toward convergence among the world’s different legal systems in the area of international commercial law (DiMatteo, 1997; DiMatteo and Dhooge, 2006; Lubman, 1988). Today, it is not easy to identify any examples of substantial divergence that produce important and predictable differences in the outcome of commercial disputes (Rosett, 1982). Certain differences in theory or approach are often offset by the countervailing force of international usage or custom, which brings about a predictable and harmonious outcome in commercial dispute resolution. It is pertinent to identify the motives behind the move toward harmonization of international contract law:

 Increase in trade and other economic relations between nations  The growth of international customary law: Commercial custom and usage have often

been used in the drafting and interpretation of commercial law. Today, certain customs and practices, derived from merchants in Europe, regarding documentary drafts, letters of credit, and so forth, are universally accepted and form the basis for domestic and international commercial law.