Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Human Memory as a Faculty Versus Human Memory as a Setof Specific Abilities: Evidence from a Life-Span Approach: Monika Knopf, J. Korkel, W. Schneider, and F. E. Weinert
      loading

      Chapter

      Human Memory as a Faculty Versus Human Memory as a Setof Specific Abilities: Evidence from a Life-Span Approach: Monika Knopf, J. Korkel, W. Schneider, and F. E. Weinert

      DOI link for Human Memory as a Faculty Versus Human Memory as a Setof Specific Abilities: Evidence from a Life-Span Approach: Monika Knopf, J. Korkel, W. Schneider, and F. E. Weinert

      Human Memory as a Faculty Versus Human Memory as a Setof Specific Abilities: Evidence from a Life-Span Approach: Monika Knopf, J. Korkel, W. Schneider, and F. E. Weinert book

      Human Memory as a Faculty Versus Human Memory as a Setof Specific Abilities: Evidence from a Life-Span Approach: Monika Knopf, J. Korkel, W. Schneider, and F. E. Weinert

      DOI link for Human Memory as a Faculty Versus Human Memory as a Setof Specific Abilities: Evidence from a Life-Span Approach: Monika Knopf, J. Korkel, W. Schneider, and F. E. Weinert

      Human Memory as a Faculty Versus Human Memory as a Setof Specific Abilities: Evidence from a Life-Span Approach: Monika Knopf, J. Korkel, W. Schneider, and F. E. Weinert book

      Edited ByFranz E. Weinert, Marion Perlmutter
      BookMemory Development

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 1988
      Imprint Psychology Press
      Pages 22
      eBook ISBN 9780203771365
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      Since the very beginning of memory research in psychology, a most controversial issue has been the question if memory represents a general, unitary human faculty or rather a variety of specific and probably independent abilities. Everyday-life experiences lead us to believe that one can distinguish between people with a generally good memory who are able to remember various incidents and facts even after a long period of time, and those who easily forget whatever they have been told to keep in mind. On the other hand, pioneers of experimental research in memory like Ebbinghaus ( 1885) or Meumann ( 1907) already considered the possibility of extreme intraindividual differences in tasks covering different memory contents (e.g., assessing memory for prose versus memory for numbers). Meumann's position was not very clear, however; in his earlier studies (cf. Meumann 1907), he proposed a distinction between a "general memory" and several "task -specific memories," whereas he doubted the existence of a "general memory" in a later publication (Meumann, 1918), emphasizing the fact that-according to his empirical investigations-only special memories could be found.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited