ABSTRACT

Internet filtering software is hot. Plaintiffs in ACLU v. Reno 1 relied heavily on the existence and capabilities of filtering software (also known as blocking software) in arguing that the Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional. 2 President Clinton has pledged to "vigorously support" the development and widespread availability of filtering software. 3 Some free speech activists see this software as the answer to the dilemma of indecency regulation, making it possible "to reconcile free express of ideas and appropriate protection for kids." 4 Indeed, some of the strongest supporters of such software are First Amendment activists who sharply oppose direct government censorship of the Net. 5