ABSTRACT

A forceful movement toward the study of argumentation has been created in North America by a group of philosophers who call themselves “informal logicians.” These informal logicians set out to study arguments from a point of view that is different from the formal logicians’. 183 Although a general conception of informal logic has gradually developed that is more or less shared by most informal logicians, it is by no means universally agreed-upon. Some informal logicians have quite a different, or a more limited, conception of informal logic. 184 Others understand it to be simply the nonformal treatment, without formal or symbolic apparatus, of elementary deductive logic. 185 For the purposes of this chapter, we shall take the most common conception of informal logic as canonical.