ABSTRACT

Demarketing has long been regarded as a special case of social marketing, particularly with respect to reducing consumption (Peattie and Peattie 2009; Gössling 2010), and its application in tourism has been surprisingly limited (Beeton and Benfield 2002; Armstrong and Kern 2011; Truong and Hall 2013), especially given that tourism was one of the examples used in the original article by Kotler and Levy (1971). Although demarketing has been interpreted by some tourism commentators as meaning a reduction in visitor numbers to a destination or attraction it is actually a far more sophisticated concept that refers to reducing and managing demand while still achieving economic and other goals. Beeton and Benfield (2002: 499) with respect to its use as a visitor and environmental management tool suggest that demarketing ‘has the potential to provide planners and managers with a range of constructive tools and techniques that, when applied to areas in a proactive manner, can result in positive and successful results’. After an introduction to the concept of demarketing this chapter provides a number of cases on demarketing from the tourism literature. Table 6.1 provides an overview of the social marketing context of the cases studies. Cases are provided at different scales and include Sissinghurst Castle in the UK, Cyprus, and the Blue Mountains and Uluru National Parks in Australia. Overview of demarketing cases discussed in Chapter 6 https://www.niso.org/standards/z39-96/ns/oasis-exchange/table">

Case

System stage(s) of tourism

Behaviour change goal

Audience research and segmentation

Social marketing mix

Exchange

Downstream (customer)/upstream focus

Competition

Theory of behaviour change

Long-term effectiveness

Sissinghurst Castle Garden (National Trust attraction)

Destination (at attraction)

Consumer decision making

Better allocation of visitor numbers in the garden by demarketing

Visitor survey

Reduction in promotion of garden as an attraction

Use of promotion

Improved experience of the garden as a result of lower number of visitors

Customer

None in a narrow sense

Communication and education

Good; the approach has been very successful in managing the high visitor demands

Cyprus (national government)

Destination

Consumer decision making

Change nature of market by focusing more on high-end tourists

Market research

All four Ps were applied

Customer

Some concern for communities

Other destinations

None

Blue

Mountains

National

Park (state government)

Destination (at attraction)

Spread visitor pressures more evenly in park and improve visitor experience

Some market research available

Promotion (via signage)

Improved visitor experience

Customer

None in a narrow sense

Communication and education

Marginal, as it was a latent form of demarketing

Uluru, Uluru National Park (national parks agency)

Destination (at attraction)

Encourage visitors not to climb Uluru

Target audiences identified for future demarketing campaigns

Primarily product and promotion. Also significant broad policy issues

Satisfaction of knowing that not climbing Uluru meets Aboriginal cultural concerns

Customer with some potential to market tour companies and encourage them to provide appropriate advice to visitors

Experience of reaching the top of Uluru

Behavioural learning? Communication and education

Potentially good though change will take a long time while voluntary