Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Humanitarianism with a sovereign face: UNHCR in the global undertow
      loading

      Chapter

      Humanitarianism with a sovereign face: UNHCR in the global undertow

      DOI link for Humanitarianism with a sovereign face: UNHCR in the global undertow

      Humanitarianism with a sovereign face: UNHCR in the global undertow book

      Humanitarianism with a sovereign face: UNHCR in the global undertow

      DOI link for Humanitarianism with a sovereign face: UNHCR in the global undertow

      Humanitarianism with a sovereign face: UNHCR in the global undertow book

      ByMichael Barnett
      BookThe International Humanitarian Order

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2009
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 29
      eBook ISBN 9780203862971
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      During the Cold War, UN organizations routinely presented themselves as “apolitical” and “humanitarian” as a signal to states that they understood their place and recognized sovereignty’s canon of noninterference. Beginning in the mid-1980s and accelerating after the end of the Cold War, however, UN organizations became more deeply involved in the domestic affairs of states. The United Nations has increased its activities in the areas of women’s rights and human rights. UN peacekeeping began trying to save “failed states” and help with the difficult transition from civil war to civil peace. And UNHCR became increasingly active in the area of refugee reintegration and erasing the “root causes” of refugee flight. UN organizations that once knew their place in the sovereign system of states and bundled their humanitarianism to the principle of noninterference were now venturing beyond the border’s edge and proclaiming that their standing as humanitarian organizations permitted them to tread on once sacred ground.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited