ABSTRACT

This book collects your writings from more than a 35-year span of time in order to make the case for you as an “innovator” in the field of political theory. But is this how you think of yourself? How do you conceive of your relation to the field of political theory, and how have you seen that relationship change over the years? Finally, is it fair to say that your early work tried harder to speak to the field of political science and that your more recent books are pitched at political theorists (who may or may not operate within the disciplinary boundaries of political science)?