Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      The 2005 Parliament
      loading

      Chapter

      The 2005 Parliament

      DOI link for The 2005 Parliament

      The 2005 Parliament book

      The 2005 Parliament

      DOI link for The 2005 Parliament

      The 2005 Parliament book

      ByRobert Waller, Byron Criddle
      BookThe Almanac of British Politics

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 8th Edition
      First Published 2007
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 80
      eBook ISBN 9780203946916
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      The 2005 general election was a flawed triumph for Tony Blair and his Labour government. On the one hand, they achieved their third successive victory with a working overall majority of 65 over all other parties combined, or 67 if the Speaker and his non-voting deputies are excluded. This enabled a third full term in office, a unique achievement for a party which had never previously governed for a longer period than six years, in 1945-51 and 1964-70. If Blair were to fulfil his stated aim of remaining Prime Minister for the bulk of the period before the next election, he would be able to surpass ten years as Prime Minister and even remain in Downing Street for a longer time than Mrs Thatcher had between 1979 and 1990. On the other hand, however, the endorsement of the electorate was unconvincing. Labour’s share of the UK vote fell to just 35.2%, the lowest share of the vote ever recorded for a winning party, and 5.5% less than in 2001. Given that the turnout, 61.5%, had only risen by 2.1% from the historic low of four years previously, barely a quarter of eligible voters had voted Labour. This was scarcely a compelling basis for a claim for a mandate supporting the legitimacy of a government as it strove to complete the New Labour ‘project’ within a context of conflictual world affairs. Furthermore, Blair’s decision in autumn 2004 to announce that he would not stand for a fourth term of office as Prime Minister uniquely placed him in the role of a ‘lame duck’ from the moment his tenure was apparently confirmed and extended.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited