ABSTRACT
The fourth chapter further compares Japanese and Chinese infrastructure development strategies in post-Soviet Central Asia (CA) by detailing the similarities and differences in the approaches of the two Asian economic powers in their infrastructure development in this region. This chapter develops several arguments with respect to the Japanese and Chinese approaches to infrastructure development in CA. It argues that the analysis of various infrastructure-related projects in CA by China and Japan demonstrates that the discourse of mutually exclusive interests in China and Japan in this region is empirically unproven. Most of the Chinese engagements emphasize the creation of energy and transportation infrastructure (construction), while Japan’s main areas of focus are the maintenance, modernization and rehabilitation of current infrastructure. Thus, this chapter suggests that China positions itself as CA’s leading economic partner, while Japan is CA’s leading assistance provider. These two roles have different implications. Furthermore, the current infrastructure engagements of Japan (from assistance to partnership) and China (from exploitation to contribution to the region) in CA demonstrate both countries’ attempts to adjust and search for new international standing.
