ABSTRACT
Limits-to-growth proponents see the United States (US) model as synonymous with the dominant productive mode of industrial society. The most easily conceptualized element of the limits-to-growth argument is the depletion of natural resources, especially those involved in energy production. Resource scarcity, as reflected in higher prices, encourages attitudes and behavioral patterns that insure the next generation of its share of raw materials. The human environment—economic, political, and social decisions and behavior—will influence developments in the physical environment. Extremist rhetoric can instill the social awareness and create the political clout needed in the battle for a moderate but effective policy response from government. The preceding examination of crisis perceptions has served to clarify some of the issues arising out of the limits debate. The focus of the controversy, the object of so much ridicule and defense, is economic growth as defined and sought in the US.
