ABSTRACT
The theory of games and other branches of formal decision theory can define fruitful directions for peace research. They can be included in curricula of peace and conflict studies programs, in the role of a theoretical framework in which the strategic thinking of intellectuals serving the military-industrial-academic establishments can be subjected to a vigorous critique. There is a science of medicine, and knowledge of it enables us to prevent, control, or cure some diseases. The controversy about whether there can be a “social science” revolves around the same issue. Some deny the existence of a social science by pointing out the indifferent success in predicting, let alone controlling, social events. The controversy over whether there is or can be a “science of peace” should be seen in the light of what is expected from such a science. Tolerance, nonviolence, and primacy of cooperative relations between human individuals and groups are values inherent in peace education.
