ABSTRACT
The process begun by the Man of Law is continued by the Monk. The Monk proposes a contribution which will achieve a similar blend of readings, but rather more easily. The significance of this proposed double ration emerges from comparison with the double dose proposed or offered by the other pilgrims. The preference of the saints for ‘true and eternal glory’ raises them as far the notice of the literary humanist as the desire of pagan women for ‘this fleeting glory’ sinks them the notice of the professor of sacred literature. The logic of the Monk’s position therefore suggests, and possibly requires, a careful separation of subject-matter and style in the two works, and a consistency of treatment within each, such that each realises its fullest effects only when set alongside its neighbour. The Monk refuses the offered alternative to his own second story, and leaves it to another to ‘pleye’.
