ABSTRACT
The theoretical justification regarding the symmetric constellation runs as follows: offensive power increases, because the 'market value' of the nation's assets increases with rising pole tension; the unit can exploit tension between the poles. Theories stressing the balance of power factor are at a disadvantage compared to most other theories seeking to explain foreign policy, because visible changes in their core explanatory factor happen infrequently, so that the factor is easily forgotten or, at best, taken for granted. The best opportunities to challenge balance of power theories occur in connection with wide-ranging and sudden power shifts. The Finnish position was much improved through the German-Soviet detente that was partially retained during the escalation of superpower tension. Baker Fox found in her study of small states during World War II that 'anti-balance of power behaviour' was typical for them, and she suggested that such behaviour might characterize small-states generally.
