Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Theoretical basis for post-anthropocentric approaches to nature and jurisprudence
      loading

      Chapter

      Theoretical basis for post-anthropocentric approaches to nature and jurisprudence

      DOI link for Theoretical basis for post-anthropocentric approaches to nature and jurisprudence

      Theoretical basis for post-anthropocentric approaches to nature and jurisprudence book

      Theoretical basis for post-anthropocentric approaches to nature and jurisprudence

      DOI link for Theoretical basis for post-anthropocentric approaches to nature and jurisprudence

      Theoretical basis for post-anthropocentric approaches to nature and jurisprudence book

      ByJohn Studley
      BookIndigenous Sacred Natural Sites and Spiritual Governance

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2018
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 7
      eBook ISBN 9780429455797
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      A world-view that drastically separates mind and body, subject and object, culture and nature, thoughts and things, values and facts, spirit and matter, human and nonhuman; a worldview that is dualistic, mechanistic, atomistic, anthropocentric, and pathologically hierarchical. Much of the recent legislation addressing the legal status of natural entities appears to represent a nascent trend away from the anthropocentric. Panentheism, to reiterate, assumes an intrinsic connection between all living things and the physical world and focuses on mystic advancement when all things will merge with the ‘world soul’. There is also a nascent trend to include sacred sites as examples of commons, notably “sacred commons” or “spiritual commons”. Pluriversal worldviews appear to resonate with Indigenous worldviews and challenge Western hegemony and universality, a nature-culture dichotomy, monophasic epistemologies, unitary ontologies, monistic pantheism and the “bipolar theism” of panentheism. Of significance for the legal status of enspirited landscapes is the advent of “late modern law”.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited