ABSTRACT
The question arises of what analysis leaves the analysis and beyond its therapeutic effects. The problem of identity is posed not only at the exit but also at moment of entry into analysis. However, the question goes far beyond the analytic framework and is useful to determine its general framework. The patronymic name is received from genealogy: it is a transmitted name. The practice of first names, and even of plural first names, also obviously aims to increase the identifying power of the patronymic name. However, its discriminatory power is conspicuous in its poverty. The second group aims, on the contrary, at eliminating every connotation. Lacan's successive formulas concerning the subject at the end of analysis are numerous: the end by assumption of "being towards death", by subjectivisation of castration, by subjective destitution of the pass, and finally by identification with the symptom.
