Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Statistical Evidence for Relatedness
      loading

      Chapter

      Statistical Evidence for Relatedness

      DOI link for Statistical Evidence for Relatedness

      Statistical Evidence for Relatedness book

      Statistical Evidence for Relatedness

      DOI link for Statistical Evidence for Relatedness

      Statistical Evidence for Relatedness book

      ByJuliette Blevins
      BookAdvances in Proto-Basque Reconstruction with Evidence for the Proto-Indo-European-Euskarian Hypothesis

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2018
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 33
      eBook ISBN 9780429505911
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      The field of linguistics has no standard way of proving that two languages are related. Nevertheless, several approaches have been suggested for evaluating whether the similarities or correspondences offered in support of a relationship between two languages are characteristics that are highly unlikely to have arisen by chance. The central purpose of this chapter is to explore any statistical method that might provide confirmation or disconfirmation that the lexical similarities, grammatical similarities, and sound correspondences observed between Proto-Basque, as reconstructed here, and Proto-Indo-European as standardly reconstructed, are not due to chance. As a consequence, two distinct methods are considered. In the first part of the discussion, results of applying Nichols’ “individual-identifying threshold” to grammatical and lexical data from the two proto-languages, is put forward. Lower numerals, pronouns, derivational paradigm, striking homophone correspondence set, and several individual-identifying lexemes are offered as evidence. In the second part, Kessler’s (2001) ‘Monte Carlo’ method is discussed. For reasons specific to the Basque data, some revisions of this method are necessary. A method based on language-specific segment inventories and phonotactics may offer more reliable results. This technique has been applied successfully to Proto-Indo-European/Proto-Basque Swadesh lists as summarized in §8.2.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited