ABSTRACT
THE SECOND DAY in the Mosaic account of creation contains many amazing scientific truths, which Moses could not possibly have known from personal observation. In the very nature of the case, we have a tremendous argument for inspiration in this fact; before certain scientific truths were known to the world of men, aye, ages before the scientific instruments that made their discovery possible were invented, Moses wrote those facts into his record with such clarity that his record has never needed revising! What was the source of his knowledge? It could not have been human wisdom, as no man knew these things to teach them to the writer, Moses. So if we reject the theory of inspiration, what other reasonable explanation of this perplexing fact have we?
