ABSTRACT
This chapter begins by defining authentic leadership, and by clarifying the current state of progress in the field. Finally, the role of eudaemonia in authentic leadership is considered. Issues associated with the measurement of authentic leadership are discussed, alongside a consideration of critiques of the approach. The role of positive psychology in authentic leadership influences many other authors, who also identify the role of morals as central to authenticity. Similarities between authentic leadership and emotional intelligence specifically relating to self-regulation argue that authentic leaders possess the ability to self-regulate their emotions and to share their emotional feelings with followers as a means of demonstrating authenticity. While some dissention exists regarding the role of ethics and morals in authentic leadership, many researchers nevertheless argue that morality remains a key part of the construct. It is possible that an authentic leader entering a new organization might face considerable resistance, particularly if the organization is a toxic one.
