ABSTRACT
This chapter explores the relation between gospel writing and gospel interpretation. It examines whether the latter succeeds the former or if both have developed in an interrelated dynamic. The chapter presents the L/M hypothesis and compares it to the 2SH. These are two of multiple models concerned with the interrelationship between Matthew and Luke. Defenders of the first model argue that Luke is a rewriting of both Mark and Matthew. Examples of modern harmonization were the proliferation of gospel harmonies in the 16th century, made possible by the printing press. Studies in the synoptic problem have traditionally aimed at explaining the relationship between the gospels. The rewriting hypothesis presupposes a distinction between the fluid text and the canonized text. It criticizes a canon-dependent approach which is sceptical of the question of textual fluidity. Michael Fishbane has written extensively on ancient Jewish literature, including on the “inner biblical exegesis” that, according to him, permeates much of the Old Testament.
