ABSTRACT
The George III collection of scientific instruments, presented on white plinths and in cases, bore little similarity to Food. The George III was not interactive or hands-on; ‘fun’ and ‘busy’ were not appropriate adjectives, and it was definitely directed at a more knowing, scholarly and adult audience than was Food. Food for Thought was in many respects a very successful exhibition. To dwell on its political ambiguities, silences and inflections is, therefore, perhaps, an academic exercise which has little relevance for the important business of ‘the public understanding of science’. The ultimate ambition of public understanding of science programmes is often expressed in terms of enabling the public to participate more fully as citizens. Science Museum has produced many new exhibitions and an impressive programme of innovative and often reflexive and interactive projects to engage the public.
