ABSTRACT
In the fifth chapter, the function of mission narrative in official foreign policy discourse is discussed. Five of its functions are identified: (1) self-identification, (2) legitimisation, (3) compensation, (4) mobilisation and (5) closing of ranks. The results of the analysis of mission motifs in the Russian official foreign policy discourse are presented in regard to their significance for Russia’s identity, status and political legitimacy. In the case of the Russian Federation, mission narrative is a “narrative habit.” It was formed during the Russian Empire, consolidated in the USSR, and today has been adapted to the requirements of the contemporary world. Mission narrative remains in official discourse as a ritualised way of describing Russia’s position in the world. The Russian elite are more sensitive to mission narrative than the general public. Importantly, the elite’s attitude to Russia’s mission is not (only) instrumental. This is also true for power-holders who are reacting to the clearly expressed ontological anxiety of society. This is a case of a narrative habit which reflects the anxiety of the elite of a great power struggling to maintain its status. Mission narrative can be regarded as the expression of “phantom messianism.”
