ABSTRACT
Freedom of movement and behaviour is valued in design, but seldom are the subproducts of excessive freedom critically discussed. Space enabling excessive freedom of movement and behaviours in public space tends to become homogeneous empty space. Two sets of design tools tending towards homogenisation of space if inadequately used are discussed: computational design (CD), robotic partitions, and atmospheric architecture.
If inappropriately used, CD can tend to design spaces based on circulation flows, thus leading to homogenisation of space. More positively, computationally design enables us to embrace contradictions and dialectics in the design process, enabling their expression in architectural spaces.
Theoretically, robotic partitions (activated by CD data) also enable total freedom of partitioning. Their use can also lead to homogenisation of space. More positively, robotic partitions can create (threshold) spaces that match the needs and desires of users, and which are thus politics in action, expressed through architectural space.
The chapter finishes with a critique of atmospheric architecture when considering a collective reception of stimuli created by humidity, light, heat, or chemicals.
