ABSTRACT
The conclusion is essentially a recap of the points made in the book, with a brief validation of its uniqueness. In the first part, the necessity of “uncaging” the city-lit from any preconceived theoretical categorization has been explained, along with the requirement of fusing literature with intensive data oriented historical structure. The second part talks of the multi-narrative, heteroglossic arguments residing inside the book's seemingly straightforward, chronology-bound historical structure.
