ABSTRACT
In this chapter, the author draws a clear distinction between the data gathering, analyses, and forming of professional forestry opinions against the theatrical performance in the courtroom. The various steps in this theatrical performance are described in some detail, and various specific issues are addressed. Tips on voir dire are offered as well as alternative approaches to the direct case in chief. The questions of how “slick” the presentation needs to be and how short or long it should be are both considered. What to expect on cross-examination and how to respond are both described. A list of specific dos and don’ts is outlined. In the end, the author asserts that the key to good courtroom presentations rests primarily on good data and good analysis but also on adherence to strong ethical standards and personal integrity. Rhetorical skills as a dramatic actor may have some added value but must fundamentally rest on the sound analysis noted earlier. The chapter includes a description of a successful example of a simplified graphical presentation to a trial jury.
