ABSTRACT
The conclusion discusses how the neighborhood resilience approach resonates with other micro-level and localized approaches to indicators of conflict and peace. Similar to these approaches, the analysis of neighborhood resilience explores highly localized nature of urban violence and structural conflict as well as create a set of tools and indicators chosen and defined in the words of the residents. The bottom-up indicators provide more specific details and essential localized experiences for improving resilience policies at the national level. The conclusion also outlines how the examination of resilience on micro level contributes to critical resilience studies, adding the complexity and multiple dimensions that should be taken into account in future investigations. Finally, it shows how four categories of practices of resilience reflected in the Four Loops Model are complementary to, and fit within, the framework of urban resilience the Rockefeller Foundation has globally advanced in their 100RC and discusses how to implement specific practices of resilience on the level of the neighborhood that were identified in this study.
