ABSTRACT

As noted in previous chapters of this text, there remains a lack of clarity as to what constitutes co-production and what does not. This has led to multiple definitions of the term occurring with no consensus to a singular, universal definition for the concept that can be used in a multitude of services. Another reason for this lack of clarity is that it is difficult to encapsulate all aspects of co-production into one short definition. Additionally, the literature base has somewhat added to this confusion by identifying different types and processes of co-production to accommodate for this. These types all depend on how much power is shared and the number of different stakeholders/individuals involved. Processes on the other hand describe what phase of the co-production process one is currently situated. All of which affect the way in which co-production is defined. To support the easing of confusion, this chapter aimed to highlight the various typologies and processes of co-production as they relate to mental health service provision.