ABSTRACT
The very terms hate groups use to label themselves operate as a rhetorical device meant to grant legitimacy. Practices of journalists can at times act as an avenue for hate in public discourse as a result. In particular, churnalism, the frowned-upon digital journalism process of quickly aggregating and reinterpreting information, and the desire to be “first” in reporting, which then does not allow sufficient time for balancing, verification; provide ample avenues. Many journalists struggle with reporting in real time in the midst of an event as complex and danger-laden as a white nationalist demonstration and such reporting practices, far from an intentional emphasis, often end up inadvertently causing problems. Indeed, it could be that white nationalist groups are hoping journalists will operate in this manner, thereby providing them with a chance to get their ideas into the mainstream—perhaps hoping for the same favor shown to the Klan in the early 20th century.
