ABSTRACT
This chapter continues the application of the Lit (literature) model of critical game theory. The focus turns to the examination of how a global democratic election for UN Secretary General could work. The first game in the chapter, Populocracy, between two masochistic players, features an Entro program solution painful for both players, along with a highest joint value Evo project solution in which the players receive first-best outcomes. The second game in the chapter, Medianocracy, between two altruistic players, features a program solution and a project solution that coincide and that involve the best outcomes for both players. In the third game, Evocracy, between two egoistic players, there is a suboptimal randomizing program solution, along with an evolutionary project solution that gives both players their best outcomes. In the fourth game, Wrong, also between two egoistic players, there is once again a suboptimal randomizing program solution, along with an evolutionary project solution that gives both players their best outcomes.
