ABSTRACT
Research indicates that the mere presence of diversity structures such as statements, plans, awards, and training programs can create an illusion of fairness even in the absence of evidence that these structures make a real difference. Over the last several years, the pressures arising from student demonstrations related to campus racial climate have drawn attention to the need for a comprehensive and systematic approach to diversity assessment. The benefits of diversity progress in terms of the inclusion of individuals with diverse social identities extend beyond the campus to society at large. Although it is sometimes difficult to categorize the different types of assessments, the primary vehicles for measuring diversity progress are equity scorecard, diversity scorecard, diversity rubric, diversity mapping and diversity audit. The preeminent value of a comprehensive diversity audit is its focus on self-study, a necessary aspect of accreditation review. Consistent with regional accreditation standards, the diversity audit involves self-reflection and self-assessment directed toward the goal of continuous improvement.
